Heres what Computer Audiophile had to say. The leading website for computer audiophile topics gave JRiver Media Center a very favorable review. Reviewed by Computer Audiophile.
Jriver Review Portable MP3 PlayersThere could be other confounding issues, but I thought this result was interesting.It connects PC to stereo, TV, remote control devices, digital cameras, scanners, and portable MP3 players. Not dramatic or in your face differences, but reproducible. I recently did a rough AB comparison with a friend on his fairly resolving system with two computers running the same music files but using the different playback programs, and the JRiver version sounded better (more detail in the treble and midrange, better spatial information, more interesting and involving overall). I have since upgraded to latest version of JRiver (21.0.23) and have ceased using Foobar at all. Operation and features were also superior at the time. JRMC was running on a Mac laptop with Boot Camp and Windows 7.I have both programs installed on my office computer system and found that JRiver worked and sounded slightly better to me than similar vintage version of Foobar.Has anybody done a thorough recent comparison of the two playback programs on a PC within the last year, and if so, what was your experience? I did a quick search on Agon forum, but did not turn up anything useful in terms of comparison. Frank , Julius , Kasaar , Alasta 224048 Review Frank , Leber , Rocky 4111 , 1. 222821 Mac Fowler 222890 Margaret E. Roon, 600, thanks but no thanks. Bit perfect audio, check Streams to any dlna renderer, check Can use many dlna controllers, check Can stream over the internet to your phone, check Handles video & audio, check Costs about 30 for a perpetual licence, check. ![]() Once you have bit-for-bit transfer, there can be no sound difference. If you do hear a difference, you are not passing bit-for-bit in both or one of those players.The issue with a player is to avoid the Windows kernel sound mixer/processor. (JPlay, etc.)I have no idea why either of these would effect sound quality if you are using a driver that passes bit-for-bit. I'm sure other software are good, but I haven't reviewed. In this mode, the Oppo will play the 192 file just fine.This is just another element which shows JRiver is highly configurable to support any sort of environment or quirk. In this mode, JRiver will decode the FLAC and send it down as strictly a WAV file. Sql visual studio for macAs long as the player you use allows you to select your device’s driver, they will all sound the same.By the way, the Benchmark driver, and I would assume any new quality DAC, passes different sampling rates and word lenths. When you fire up your player such as Foobar, you then go into Perferences and select the Benchmark driver. Benchmark has their own driver that passes bit-for-bit. Let’s say you install a Benchmark DAC and connect it, as you should, to your computer USB port. Word for mac will not tab a sub bullettI have Foobar set to view by folder structure and it is fabulous. You just don’t need to worry about that stuff now.The real issue with these players, IMO, is their library management tools and speed of indexing. These DAC drivers eliminate the need for the older ASIO and other generic drivers. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorMiriam ArchivesCategories |